Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Janet Asiain's avatar

Beautiful. I do wonder, though, about what they call “the carrying capacity of the land” now that the numbers of humans that lived here (or anywhere) in the 1800s , when my house was built, have swelled to many multiples of those who lived without electricity or cars (etc) back then. I can imagine ways to accommodate most, maybe all, of us, but the degree of neighborliness would be extreme, possibly even by your standards. Comments?

Expand full comment
Corrie's avatar

Hey Adam, all this truth ❤️ thank you. My experience is so similar. When I begin to approach “collapse” (insert whatever other word here) with anyone, most punt it away, some say “well then what do I do?” (To those I respond with “start within” and then they’re gone lol Americans and their to-do lists, will grip them till death) but then there are the leaders of movements who say about any return to old but tried and true ways “not compatible with modernity!” “That’s not what people want, they won’t stay to listen” “that’s not practical or urgent, it has to be more strategic” and of any land and life work they say “nice but wont work unless my solutions including my science are involved” (as if anyone is wanting to cosplay as a way to respond??? How condescending)

But beneath the ego buttresses ramming up against each other in the space of platforms and personalities are the quiet people doing what has always worked, which is grow up, be wise, and get your hands dirty. There are zero precise solutions to what is unfolding.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts